The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal gaming.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, but the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the questionable sites using both totally free casino-style video games and financially rewarding rewards, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'play for complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to point out suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments act as conventional gambling establishments, only without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulatory hurdles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in profits last year alone. Now the company faces accusations of prohibited gambling in a New York claim that declares VGW uses star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's declaration listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can trust Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar illegal operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom provide any distinctions between conventional gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - video games are free

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he routinely promotes on social networks

Read More

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements generally center around the social aspect of the casinos, while omitting the capacity for real gambling losses.

Others lure consumers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media advertisement showing off Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and mansions before rotating to footage of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much money?' check out the first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never quit.'

The discrepancy in between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A representative for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competition with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are sports betting free.

'Most social sweeps consumers never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the common deposit or bet size at real-money online gambling websites.'

Social casinos provide clients a chance to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the choice to purchase valueless currency frequently referred to as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged for real cash, however can be used to open numerous features within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, allowing consumers to obtain other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones claimed by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One player told the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of cash and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps casino Stake ran an advertisement displaying Drake's automobiles, aircrafts and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all however 7 states, which has actually assisted to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which don't need generally require recognition. However, websites like Chumba will request for IDs from gamers attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable consumers to send mail-in demands for totally free sweeps coins, offered the players follow painfully specific instructions. What's more, gamers are typically rewarded with sweeps coins simply for registering, thereby giving them a factor to try their hands at any number of casino video games for a chance to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to run in 48 states, while online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the totally free casino-style gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is simply a way of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are merely a kind of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never have to spend for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is an important distinction in between social sweeps and standard online gambling sites like casinos.'

Think of the method that McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, however rather they're buying hamburgers and fries that offer them the opportunity to win profitable rewards, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself does not satisfy the meaning of sports betting in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing approach for promoting all sort of everyday businesses in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine subscriptions to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are regularly utilized by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of sports betting market insiders, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming lawyer Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run forever. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being utilized to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're usually not connected to casino-style video games of chance,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're just money free gifts.

'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] have none of the qualities typically related to McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments offer" casino-like" payments, generally 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the normal payment percentage for a momentary promotional sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the income earned by the company [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, providing clients the chance to play casino-style games for genuine prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually considering that been shuttered over claims of unlawful gambling.

DJ Khaled is among a number of celebrity spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos ought to face comparable scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps gambling establishments. 'They have actually repeatedly been mentioned by courts and state chief law officer as key consider figuring out that a sweepstakes promo was in truth a guise for prohibited gambling.'

One of the gambling establishment market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being denied of securities and states are passing up significant tax and profits chances as this gaming changes that conducted through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the plaintiffs who have actually sued social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 separate cases in Kentucky without confessing any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW concurred to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued litigation.

Michael Phelps has signed an offer with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most current claim, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New York state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'unlawful gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for comment.

'We usually don't discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW representative told DailyMail.com through email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been formally served.

'We have full self-confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we run, and remain positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games across many of North America, as we have for more than a decade, developing not just excellent video games, user experiences and entertainment, however also guaranteeing this is done safely, responsibly and at the highest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are reasonably typical across the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we mean to vigorously protect any claim which might be brought against us.'

The issues between conventional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments might show bothersome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking illegal sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the same time the leagues wish to project a strong stance versus unlawful sports betting - particularly when trying to tamp down the occasional sports betting scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time ban from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unrelated to anything including social or sweepstakes casinos.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably illegal gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a significant problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites refers when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesperson nor the players' agents responded to DailyMail.com's ask for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise ignored to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their star endorsers have a responsibility to explain to customers the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have full self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our company practices more broadly,' the spokesperson said. 'A few of our worths are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of everything we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to dubious illegal gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their reputations at threat in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who declare damage,' Glaser stated. 'There is likewise some danger that state regulators and state lawyers basic rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with illegal gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton